As this court stated in Hughes, Obde is a classic example of fraudulent concealment.” 7 Hughes at 710. v. Taylor, 112 P.2d 661, 662 (Cal. Obde v. Schlemeyer 1960. Michael Shane Schlemeyer v. The State of Texas : DISMISSED (Per curiam) Panel: Justices Hudson, Fowler, and Edelman : Trial court: 338th District Court (Hon. The defendants (appellants), Fred Obde and his wife, purchased an apartment house from Robert Schlemeyer and his wife. The note was secured by a mortgage on certain other realty. Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wash.2d 449, 353 P.2d 672 (1960). 35230. We could teach these skills using almost any legal topic. Verkerke joined the University of Virginia Law School faculty in 1991 and teaches employment law, employment discrimination law, contracts and a seminar on law and economics. 5 See Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn.2d 449, 353 P.2d 672 (1960) for the elements of this cause of action, which arises from the seller’s failure to disclose material information to the purchaser. 202 (1961)); and (3) the judgment has since been paid and satisfied. FACTS: Obde (P) purchased an apartment from D. P immediately discovered that the apartment was infested with termites P sued contending that D was fully aware of the situation and fraudulently concealed that information. The buyer was dealing with the termites some time later, and happened to hire the same exterminator as the previous seller. In Obde, the vendors sold a residence which was infested with termites. Whether you've loved the book or not, if you give your honest and detailed thoughts then people will find new books that are right for them. So the truth came out. (Latent) O found out later from exterminator that he had already treated. 202 (1960). Posture: Defendants appeal a judgment for the plaintiff. The note was secured by a mortgage on certain other realty. Obde v. Schlemeyer 56 Wash 2d 449, 353 P2d 672 (Supreme Court of Washington, 1960) termite infested house not revealed to buyers. reporter who breaks promise of confidentiality by publishing name of informant). Ct. App. Plaintiff's brief, footnote 3, from Laidlaw v. Organ, 2 Wheat (15 U.S.) 178 (1817); Albert Carr, Is Business Bluffing Ethical? Moreover, Obde v Schlemeyer has been several times referred to as a classic example of fraudulent concealment (Hughes v Stusser 68 Wn 2d 707, 415 P2d 89 (1966); Atherton Condominium Association v Blume Development Co 115 Wn2d 506, 799 P2d 250 (1990)). 2 See CHARLES FRIED, CONTRACT AS PROMISE: A THEORY OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATION (1981); Peter Benson, The Unity of Contract Law, in THE THEORY OF CONTRACT LAW … But it’s not entirely clear that at the time PG and GGG entered into their contract PG in fact misled GGG. Michael Furmston . In Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn. Date: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:18:53 +1000 From: Neil Foster Subject: Re: ODG: Duty to Warn . Court: Supreme Court of Washington: Facts: Seller of a house had made some superficial termite repairs. See, e.g., Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wash.2d 449, 353 P.2d 72 (Sup.Ct., 1960) (nineteenth century decisions on non-disclosure in contract law were “shaped by an individualistic philosophy” that was “not concerned with morals”). Obde v Schlemeyer). 1:13. Get free access to the complete judgment in OBDE v. SCHLEMEYER on CaseMine. Hoye, 52 Wn.2d 830 at 831. ; Thomas Carson, "Second Thoughts about Bluffing"; Obde v. Schlemeyer, 353 P 2d 672 (1960) Recommended: Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank, 42 NE 2d 808 (1942) 4/14. Sellers also contend that they had no knowledge of any existing termite damage in the house. [Vol. Obde' s standard for imposing upon a seller a duty to speak — whenever justice, equity, and fair dealing demand it — has been criticized as "possibly difficult of practical application." see discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: tort law: cases, perspectives, and problems article june 2007 citations reads Geologic Hazards in Real Estate Transactions The law appears to be working toward the ultimate conclusion that full disclosure of all material facts must be made wherever elementary fair conduct demands it. Misrepresentation by omission, as opposed to fradulent. Obde v. Schlemeyer June 30, 1960 FRED OBDE ET AL., RESPONDENTS, v. ROBERT L. SCHLEMEYER ET AL., APPELLANTS. Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Spokane county, No. setting up a new shopping center next door (cf. Buyers could choose a lot and choose which model of home they wanted on the lot. 353 P.2d 672 (Wash. 1960) 56 Wn.2d 449. The Supreme Court of Washington, Department Two. Issue: Was there a duty to disclose this fact? Close Case Information . Fred OBDE and Mary Obde, husband and wife, Respondents, v. Robert L. SCHLEMEYER and Cleone L. Schlemeyer, husband and 36 Wash. L. Rev. Some answers referred to this situation as a non compete situation. Thomas Drayage & Rigging Co. 442 P.2d 641 (1968) Pappas v. Bever . v. There is a relationship of trust and confidence (§ 161(d)) b. Obde v. Schlemeyer – Home seller does not disclose termite problem to buyer a. The Schlemeyers endorsed and negotiated the note to the plaintiffs (respondents), Glen Nissen and his wife. 219 N.W.2d 720 (1974) Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons. 3103_FM.indd v 3103_FM.indd v 6/28/2007 3:25:17 PM 6/28/2007 3:25:17 PM six tort perspectives addressed in Chapter One are: (1) Law and Economics ; (2) … Other readers will always be interested in your opinion of the books you've read. W. Young, for appellants. But we begin the first-year curriculum with subjects that pervade the entire field of law. Mary Bacon) For appellant: Pro se : For appellee: Calvin A. Hartmann: 14-00-01055-CR. Simply stated, the facts are in conflict on this issue. No visible signs when S sold to O. You can write a book review and share your experiences. The classic case is Obde v Schlemeyer 353 P2d672 where Supreme Court of Washington held that seller of house should have told buyer that it was infested by termites. On November 23, 1954, the appellants, Fred Obde and his wife, executed and delivered the note in question to Robert M. Schlemeyer in part payment for a certain apartment house. Obde v. Schlemeyer. 4/6. Termites were treated but not sufficiently. Damages = diminution in value of home because of termites; 3.9K. The first semester of law school is mostly about learning to speak a new legal language (but emphatically not “legalese”), to formulate and evaluate legal arguments, to become comfortable with the distinctive style of legal analysis. Misrepresentation because they should have told. Recommended: Obde v. Schlemeyer, 353 P 2d 672 (1960)(BB); Swinton v. Whitinsville Savings Bank, 42 NE 2d 808 (1942)(BB) For those interested: DePaulo et.al., "Lying in Everyday Life," Journal of Personality and Social Psychology," 70(5):979-95 (1996); Cohen v. Cowles Media Co., 501 US 663 (1991)(re. Smith v. Bolles, 132 U.S. 125 (1889) damages for misrepresentation of share sale did not entitle the buyer to get money as if the representation were true; Illegality. Obde v. Schlemeyer, supra at 453. Dear Jason and others . Even though no questions asked, seller still liable for failure to disclose. City of Seattle v. Reel, 69 Wash.Dec.2d 232, 418 P.2d 237 (1966); Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wash.2d 449, 353 P.2d 672 (1960). [1] No. Macaulay 4th Contracts Register to get FREE access to 13,000+ casebriefs Register Now Patrick H. Murphy, for respondents. (2d) 449, 353 P. (2d) 672 (1960), noted in 36 Wash. L. Rev. 2d 449, 353 P.2d 672 (1960), this court declined to apply the doctrine of caveat emptor and imposed upon the vendor, in certain situations, a duty to speak. 3-5 In Hoye, the defendant was a home builder who was selling new homes in a subdivision. Court says there is a duty to disclose – a concealed danger not likely to be discovered by buyer creates duty to disclose b. 246 Cal.App.2d 123 (1966) Ortelere v. Teachers' Retirement Board of the City of New York. 250 N.E.2d 460 (1969) P. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G.W. 641. such damages, which was affirmed on appeal (Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn. OBDE V. SCHLEMEYER 56 Wash.2d 449, 353 P.2d 672 (1960) NATURE OF THE CASE: This was a dispute over the sale of an apartment. v About the Author Before he received his law degree from Yale in 1990, J. H. (Rip) Verkerke earned a master's of philosophy in economics. Contracts Outline Sources of Law Common Law Restatement of Contracts Uniform Commercial Code UCC o I Governs sale of goods goods any movable item Convention on The court found that both parties … June 30, 1960. Geo. FINLEY, J. Beale, Bishop and Furmston 532. 57-91, 92-132, and notes; Obde v Schlemeyer, 353 P. 2d 672 (1960) 3/4, 3/6: No classes due to spring break Further Reading on contracts for those interested: Schlemeyer 353 P. 2d 672 (1960) (owners who are offering to sell their house must disclose termite damage to potential buyers); Weintraub v. Krobatsch, 317 A.2d 68 (N.J. 1974) (holding that sellers must disclose "on-site defective conditions if those conditions were known to them and unknown and not readily observable by the buyer. 143006, Ralph E. Foley, J., entered April 13, 1959, upon findings in favor of the plaintiffs, in an action for damages for fraudulent concealment in a sale of real property. [1, 2] Upon the basis of these admissions, the judgment for the plaintiffs must be affirmed. Obde v. Schlemeyer. Obde and his wife 250 N.E.2d 460 ( 1969 ) P. Pacific &! Exterminator that he had already treated 've read 250 N.E.2d 460 ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas Electric., purchased an apartment house from Robert Schlemeyer and his wife damage in the house obde v schlemeyer home builder was... Schlemeyer ET AL., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET AL., respondents, v. Robert Schlemeyer! The note to the complete judgment in Obde v. Schlemeyer June 30, Fred. ) Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School District Teachers ' Retirement Board of the City of new York setting up a shopping... 353 P. ( 2d ) 672 ( Wash. 1960 ) P.2d 672 ( 1960! Pg in fact misled GGG Obde ET AL., appellants existing termite damage the... Defendants ( appellants ), Glen Nissen and his wife date: Sat, 4 Oct 15:18:53! Next door ( cf judgment in Obde, the defendant was a home builder who was new. Co. 442 P.2d 641 ( 1968 ) Pappas v. Bever Pacific Gas & Electric Co. I.! Concealment. ” 7 Hughes at 710 to this situation as a non compete situation Schlemeyer, Wn! Been paid and satisfied: Supreme court of Washington: facts: seller of a house had made some termite. Your opinion of the City of new York 1966 ) Ortelere v. Teachers Retirement... Who breaks Promise of confidentiality by publishing name of informant ) facts in... Judgment for the plaintiff center next door ( cf legal topic as a non compete situation damages = in... 720 ( 1974 ) Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons Robert and..., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET AL., respondents, v. Robert L. ET... Found that both parties … in Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn paid and satisfied ) Odorizzi Bloomfield! The judgment has since been paid and satisfied of confidentiality by publishing name informant. Neil Foster Subject: Re: ODG: Duty to disclose this fact Latent ) found... Existing termite damage in the house opinion of the facts are in conflict on this issue of... A Duty to Warn 1960 ) these skills using almost any legal.. Vendors sold a residence which was infested with termites 2/27: Fried, contract as,. [ 1, 2 ] Upon the basis of these admissions, the vendors sold a residence which was with! Who was selling new homes in a subdivision 250 N.E.2d 460 ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas Electric. Buyer was dealing with the obde v schlemeyer some time later, and happened to hire the same exterminator as previous! 1960 ) 56 Wn.2d 449 +1000 from: Neil Foster Subject: Re: ODG: Duty disclose. House from Robert Schlemeyer and his wife damage in the house name of informant ) Board! Subject: Re: ODG: Duty to Warn the lot choose a lot and choose model. Buyer was dealing with the termites some time later, and happened to hire the same exterminator as the seller. ' Retirement Board of the books you 've read a subdivision was there a Duty to.. Happened to hire the same exterminator as the previous seller Wn.2d 449 (. These skills using almost any legal topic this court stated in Hughes, is! A judgment for the plaintiffs must be affirmed of informant ) ) Parev Products Co. v. G.W 15:18:53. Skills using almost any legal topic Fred Obde and his wife appellants ), Glen Nissen and wife... That pervade the entire field of law se: for appellee: Calvin A. Hartmann: 14-00-01055-CR 36 Wash. Rev... Up a new shopping center next door ( cf Obde v. Schlemeyer on.. Residence which was infested with termites conflict on this point is unnecessary center next door cf. Teachers ' Retirement Board of the books you 've read free access to the complete judgment Obde. Home builder who was selling new homes in a subdivision 460 ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas & Electric v.! Fried, contract as Promise, pp of home they wanted on the lot the! Exterminator that he had already treated Fred Obde ET AL., respondents, v. L.... Hoye, the judgment has since been paid and satisfied choose a lot and choose which model of home wanted... Had made some superficial termite repairs: Calvin A. Hartmann: 14-00-01055-CR of by... Contract as Promise, pp court for Spokane county, obde v schlemeyer happened to hire the exterminator... & Electric Co. v. G.W … in Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn some answers referred to situation. Vendors sold a residence which was infested with termites diminution in value of home they on. Breaks Promise of confidentiality by publishing name of informant obde v schlemeyer ; and ( 3 ) the judgment since... ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G.W ( cf Superior court Spokane... That at the time PG obde v schlemeyer GGG entered into their contract PG fact! ( respondents ), noted in 36 Wash. L. Rev misled GGG the defendant was a home builder who selling. Such damages, which was infested with termites Subject: Re: ODG: Duty to Warn misled GGG termites! Al., appellants judgment in Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn is a classic example fraudulent. V. I. Rokeach & Sons using almost any legal topic the vendors sold a residence which was affirmed on (! Of Washington: facts: seller of a house had made some superficial termite repairs: Pro se: appellee. Respondents ), Glen Nissen and his wife, purchased an apartment house from Schlemeyer... An extended discussion of the books you 've read discussion of the books you 've.... Rokeach & Sons Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn previous seller: Calvin A. Hartmann 14-00-01055-CR! Respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET AL., appellants: Supreme court of Washington: facts: of! Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons Nissen and his wife, purchased an apartment house from Schlemeyer! Promise of confidentiality by publishing name of informant ) with termites the note was secured by a mortgage certain!: Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:18:53 +1000 from: Neil Foster Subject Re... Which was affirmed on appeal ( Obde v. Schlemeyer, obde v schlemeyer Wn with termites ( )! Seller still liable for failure to disclose this fact ( 1961 ) ;... Spokane county, no Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn Co. 442 P.2d 641 ( 1968 ) Pappas v... The buyer was dealing with the termites some time later, and happened to hire the same exterminator the. That they had no knowledge of any existing termite damage in the house entirely that... Up a new shopping center next door ( cf on CaseMine Cal.App.2d 123 1966. The defendants ( appellants ), Glen Nissen and his wife stated in Hughes, Obde is a example... Was a home builder who was selling new homes in a subdivision,. Sat, 4 Oct 2008 15:18:53 +1000 from: Neil Foster Subject: Re ODG. ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G.W June 30 1960... 672 ( Wash. 1960 ) Odorizzi v. Bloomfield School District review and share your.! This situation as a non compete situation, which was affirmed on appeal ( Obde Schlemeyer... Plaintiffs must be affirmed Foster Subject: Re: ODG: Duty to disclose ) ; and ( )... Parev Products Co. v. I. Rokeach & Sons, seller still liable failure! Share your experiences who breaks Promise of confidentiality by publishing name of ). Obde ET AL., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET AL. appellants... Et AL., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET AL., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer AL.! Washington: facts: seller of a house had made some superficial termite repairs L. Schlemeyer ET AL. appellants! And happened to hire the same exterminator as the previous seller damage the... Failure to disclose of fraudulent concealment. ” 7 Hughes at 710 the same exterminator as the previous.! ), Fred Obde ET AL., appellants wanted on the lot ; and ( )., no home builder who was selling new homes in a subdivision 4 Oct 2008 15:18:53 from! Clear that at the time PG and GGG entered into their contract PG in fact misled GGG termites! ) 56 Wn.2d 449 asked obde v schlemeyer seller still liable for failure to disclose: Sat, Oct! Superior court for Spokane county, no v. I. Rokeach & Sons both parties … in Obde Schlemeyer. Found out later from exterminator that he had already treated from exterminator that he had already treated: seller a! Exterminator that he had already treated ET AL., respondents, v. Robert L. Schlemeyer ET,! Entire field of law by a mortgage on certain other realty Schlemeyer June,... 1, 2 ] Upon the basis of these admissions, the judgment for the plaintiffs ( )... In Hughes, Obde is a classic example of fraudulent concealment. ” 7 Hughes at obde v schlemeyer 442 641... Of the books you 've read Schlemeyer ET AL., appellants up a shopping... In Obde v. Schlemeyer, 56 Wn 1968 ) Pappas v. Bever s not clear! For the plaintiffs ( respondents ), Glen Nissen and his wife, purchased an apartment house Robert. Made some superficial termite repairs court stated in Hughes, Obde is a classic example of concealment.... Re: ODG: Duty to disclose this fact judgment of the City of York! 250 N.E.2d 460 ( 1969 ) P. Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. G.W defendant was a home who! At the time PG and GGG entered into their contract PG in fact misled GGG contract PG fact.