First difference we will find in initialization approach. Makes writing tests for TDD under .NET Core a breeze. Obvs, as the newer kid XUnit is also installed via NuGet. I’ve just started yet another pet project and wanted to pick a unit testing framework (.NET). JavaScript, unsurprisingly, has one of the largest arrays of potential test frameworks. I know some people think that you should only use one assert per test but it feels a bit weird to not give the user the choice of a message or not. xUnit.net and works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin. Question: when running tests async, is there not a possibility that concurrent threads may affect the results of tests? All these libraries have some annoying features. I'm looking for people's opinions on xUnit compared to NUnit. It brings xUnit tests to everyone out of the box. NNunit or xUnit (and then using Shouldly with either) is my preferred approach. What is JUnit? Especially annoying in places like Selenium tests, where you might want to take screenshots and browser logs in cases of failure. I haven't used MSTest for a while and forgot about the little annoyances with that library. Just out of interest, how you answer both of your questions? "Supported and used by Microsoft itself" is the primary reason people pick xUnit.NET over the competition. 328. To make some setup code run before some tests, but not before others, you have to adhere to weird, non-obvious namespace conventions. I think it was that xUnit had some features like parameterized tests that saved me a bunch of effort. You can take a look here: https://github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers. Also you may … More stable and tests run a lot faster. NUnit contains SetUp attribute which can be set on a choosen public method. Asserts calling async code like Assert.ThrowsAsync are synchronous, that's a bit jarring and always makes me afraid of deadlocks in tests. For example, to run some code before each test in NUnit you would use the SetUpAttribute on the method you want to execute. Another favourite question of mine is "What's the purpose of TDD". JUnit is a simple framework to write repeatable tests. Actual: System.Threading.Tasks.Task". Also, there are duplicate facilities like constructors and [SetUp] methods, and usually this leads to half of your test code using one thing and another half using another. If I were you I would choose xUnit for the new experience mostly. XUnit and MSTest with ExpectedException Returning Different Results. Much has been written about why this improves test isolation. @bradwilson: Thanks, I'll try.But generally, do you think is this a Visual Studio problem, and can it be worked around somehow in the xUnit runner? When my team put this to a vote recently xUnit won by a couple of votes. In xUnit, constructor is the only one way to initialize test class. There's a lot of discussion about the design damage that TDD can cause. Some of the nuget packages are dependent on being .NET Framework (for Sitecore 8.2) and thus I can't add them to a .NET Core project. JUnit vs xUnit: What are the differences? To tell the truth – I don't care. Features. Followers 328 + 1. One reason I like xUnit more than NUnit is that xUnit discourages per-test setup and teardown by only allowing constructor setup and teardown. A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. It works great. Also the documentation on Xunit was not as thorough as Nunits when we were making our decison. Written by the original inventor of NUnit v2, xUnit.net is the latest technology for unit testing C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. In xUnit you put your test-initialization inside the constructor of your test-class. Pretty good post about it here: http://xunit.github.io/docs/why-did-we-build-xunit-1.0.html. The most important reason people chose xUnit.NET is:.NET Core area etc. If you are using azure DevOps for your CICD pipelines and test case management, mstest is the only framework that can associate your test case to a test method in your code when the vstest task is executed. Tests can be run from a console runner, within Visual Studio through a Test Adapter or through 3rd party runners. I personally like and use XUnit in all my projects. This is reflected in the fact that a lot of asserts don't support a message parameter. While some developers don’t like unit testing and some even hate it, I think that most will agree that it’s a valuable discipline. Compare NUnit vs xUnit. Just a normal class library. To do so we will be using the new [InLineData] tag and Theories. Using MSTest, xUnit or NUnit with dotnet core. Also, there's apparently a bunch of reasons why the authors of NUnit decided to write xUnit. xUnit is an open source testing framework for the .Net framework and was written by the inventor of NUnit v2. XUnit continues to innovate. 1. xUnit showing truncated Expected and Actual in … That is, say if tests dip into the same resources, be it a db or some other mocked object(s)? xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. Ok, so either way I'm in good shape with whichever one I choose? In MS Test there several initialization available (by attributes):AssemblyInitialize,ClassInitialize and TestInitialize. I found a work-around, but that shouldn't have been necessary. Votes 0 interesting. XUnit has more popularity at the moment, but I don't think choosing NUnit is foolish at all. Cookies help us deliver our Services. xUnit.net works with ReSharper, CodeRush, TestDriven.NET and Xamarin. @ScottyLightnin, apologies for delay on this, the issue lies in VS IDE, where we are not sending the xunit adapter path to UWP app, where the test is running. There is nunit analyzer, which will show warning if you're using Assert.That(act, Is.EqualTo(exp)) for non-comparable types. We have been mandated to use XUnit tests, but our solution is all .NET Framework. Neither will change your life for the better (or worse) in any dramatic way. While NUnit works fine for passing in parameters, on the other hand xUnit has better support for Microsoft's TestServer and WebApplicationFactory classes when implementing integration tests which keeps your tests lean & clean, but we simply can't be consistent in our test frameworks because of these limitations with the console runner. MSTest v1 is quite bad after you've used NUnit or xUnit. In this blog, I give a brief overview and compare two commonly used unit-testing frameworks used for .NET, NUnit and xUnit. They're both good choices. Also, xUnit has the static Record.Exception(Action action) methods, which really helps you test your exception handling while still following the Arrange-Act-Assert flow: It is a very simple utility, and it can easily be implemented on your own for use with NUnit. The xunit adapter will support only xunit. I use both; NUnit at the office, and XUnit for my personal projects. Console logging can be a pain. 3. NUnit is an open-source unit testing framework for Microsoft .NET. Not sure what the current version of Mono is though, last I checked 4.3 was still under dev. Personally, I think "Is my production code testable?" In xUnit you don't have a test set-up and tear-down like you would in MsTest and NUnit. edit: apparently nUnit 3 has parallel test execution too. This allows you to run your unit tests and have their results reported to the test case in ADO including the TRX file, data collectors and associated files. Single Object Instance per Test Method. I think it's really a matter of taste. Project should have tests and tests framework shouldn't be MSTest — this is all I care. This was something we didn't like, having been mostly using Nunit or MS Test during our careers. What is xUnit? It supports Assert.Inconclusive which is really helpful for integration tests and they support data-driven tests that are comparable to XUnit. I appreciate the opinion of someone in the career field as I learning from scratch. It's not a deal breaker for Nunit IMO but it's definitely a plus in Xunits court. xUnit makes better usage of the language than NUnit, basic concepts like using constructors and IDisposable make way more sense than setup/teardown attributes. I've used both. So xUnit has been built from the learnings of NUnit and it definitely changes the game in terms of its approach compared to its competitors. "Expected: 3. MSTest v2 fixes a lot of serious issues with v1. I sort of liked xUnit better, but it's been so long I've forgotten exactly why. Packages for writing tests; xunit: This is the package that will most typically be used by unit test authors. Especially annoying when you're making a large refactoring. NUnit has attributes that arguably make writing tests slightly faster while increasing the learning curve slightly. I could have just moved my per-test setups to constructor setups, but I haven't. Much like the [TestCase] tag in NUnit, XUnit has its own solution to providing parameters to a test case. xUnit.net is a free, open source, community-focused unit testing tool for the .NET Framework. xUnit just works in a CI setup, it's great. It is used to test C#, F#, VB.NET and other .NET languages. We transferred from n to x recently. xUnit.net v2 XML Format. XUnit is also a pain in the ass when I'm trying to log diagnostics in an async setting. As others stated, circumstances shouldn't really dictate which one you use since they all do the same thing essentially. Circumstances are of no concern here. I'm partial to xUnit + Fluent Assertions. They were informative and mostly correct, unfortunately all completely missed the one big difference between those two excellent unit testing frameworks… FakeItEasy 1.x does not and caused a bunch of headaches for us but the 2.0 beta release has resolved those. This is not high brow philosophical BS, it's a reaction to a lot of low brow agile consultant driven drivel that's somehow become dogma. 674. It isnt as straight forward as Nunit. In the question “What are the best unit testing frameworks for.NET?” xUnit.NET is ranked 1st while NUnit is ranked 2nd. FakeItEasy 1.x does not and caused a bunch of headaches for us but the 2.0 beta release has resolved those. MSTest is also less opinionated than XUnit. The latter has stupid design philosophies like "only one assert per test". NUnit was Initially ported from JUnit. Writing tests is almost harder than writing the code you're intending to test. Thus, the process of reading began! xUnit is pretty lean compared to NUnit and MsTest and has been written more recently. If you are used to using categories from other frameworks, the Trait attribute is slightly confusing when you first look at it. You can simply use a member variable (e.g. There are many constraints on your ability to write good tests, the framework used barely registers as one of them. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, Press J to jump to the feed. This is especially true when you are doing some version of red green refactoring/TDD. xUnit.NET, NUnit, and MSTest are probably your best bets out of the 3 options considered. I been learning unit testing for a while but I confused as to which one to focus on. You can circumvent that somewhat by writing your own methods and using the xUnit equivalents within them, catching the Baseexception and then using your own strategy on how to build the assertion message writing it by using Assert.False(true, "bla bla bla") ... You don't actually need a context to do this. More details can be found on xUnit’s Github page. A workaround is using constructor to init a test class. It looks like NUnit's developed some of those features. xUnit2 should work under Mono 4.3, as I believe that issue is patched now. And then just evaluate that variable in your dispose method. Once you get down to it, they are both pretty similar. The major constraints are the quality of the code you're testing (if pre-existing) and your understanding of software architecture and craftsmanship. Simple as that. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. While studying, I happened to find that MS Test, Nunit and Xunit (no doubt, there can be so many other frameworks too) were the most frequently used test frameworks, when it comes to working with unit testing of .NET applications. Nunits works with core as well, I use it at work due to the team having more familiarity with it. A programmer-oriented testing framework for Java. Test fixture setup and the such will need a rewrite, but that's easier than finding every "Assert.IsEqual". I'll offer my opinions on them, if it helps. The.NET framework has evolved since NUnit was first created. The framework used never really enters into the discussion. An open source, community-focused unit testing tool. One feature xUnit supports is running your tests in parallel which is tricky to do with nUnit. In xUnit.net we create a new instance per test. Shows a Test Explorer in the Test view in VS Code's sidebar with all detected tests and suites and their state; Adds CodeLenses to your test files for starting and debugging tests It is required to mark not only test methods, but also test classes with attributes. I had to relearn a few things, and I think NUnit could do a better job explaining its assertions, but I haven't yet found myself saying "Gee, this would've been a ton easier in xUnit.". Looking at StackOverflow data we see that MochaJS and Jest generate far more questions than either AvaJS or Tape. I find that my tests are easier to read now. No … Developers describe NUnit as "An open-source unit testing framework".An evolving, open source framework designed for writing and running tests in Microsoft .NET programming languages.It is an aspect of test-driven development , which is part of a larger software design paradigm known as Extreme Programming. This article is linked on xUnit's comparison page about why you shouldn't use NUnit SetUp and TearDown. However, I will admit Xunits other pro is that it seems more light weight than Nunit. XUnit leverage some of the new features to help developers write cleaner test, as tests should be kept clean and treated as first-class citizens. It really doesn't matter. Regardless, I don't use either's assertion but rather use Shouldly for that. The xUnit.Net adapter can also be found at Visual Studio Gallery (traits implemented in version 0.9.3), and the framework is found on NuGet the same way, search for “xUnit”, and install both the same way as done for NUnit, adding the libraries to the test project. If I was starting a new project, I'd definitely go with xUnit since it has all the new sauce. Similarily, to do some cleanup in NUnit you use the TearDownAttribute, while in xUnit you implement IDisposable. I interview people quite a lot and a question I like to ask is what makes a test good, and what makes a test bad. Echoing others in this thread, evaluate what works for your environment. In xUnit you also don't have one test attribute, instead, you have Facts and Theories! xUnit also makes a handful of philosophical statements that some things NUnit does are bad for test design. Wow I didn't know that (I use NUnit but been thinking about trying XUnit). I'll follow up with the UWP team internally, & will update once a fix is made by them. Not sure about the mono bug, but I've also used both NUnit and xUnit. Ok thank you for your opinion. 0. I've used all three. NXunit Test Explorer for Visual Studio Code. Assert.AreEqual is not generic. I've only used MSTest and NUnit before. If you are familiar with NUnit then it's like a hybrid of the category and propertyattributes. is more important than "Are my unit tests testable?" It is required to mark not only test methods, but also test classes with attributes, so the test code is littered with this unnecessary verbosity. Under which circumstances would I use either of them or should I just focus on one. I've rambled on too long already, the tl;dr is: Doesn't matter, focus on why/if you should write tests and how. That certainly makes a difference with lots of tests, but it also means you need to make sure things like your faking library supports it. xUnit needs no introduction.It is a free, open-source unit testing tool for .NET which has been around for years. I recommend The Art of Unit Testing to get started. Apparently, the problem has been long lingering there, as @TheFastCat notes. If they don't mention something like "it informs the design of the software", or "it guides the architecture...", then I start to worry about what sort of tests they're writing. I know you kinda answered the second one, but I'm interested to hear more. When comparing NUnit vs xUnit.NET, the Slant community recommends xUnit.NET for most people. Nunits works with core as well, I use it at work due to the team having more familiarity with it. These days, I use xunit a lot with TeamCity. Does VS is able to work with 2 unit test providers in simultaneously? I personally prefer xUnit, because of their reliance on language features instead of attributes. You can do this manually by connecting to TFS apis for N/Xunit but it’s out of the box with MSTest. GRRR! One feature xUnit supports is running your tests in parallel which is tricky to do with nUnit. What's the difference compared with Assert.Throws? So a 'Fact' is a test that doesn't take any input paramet… Xunit is updated more frequently and as others have pointed out is more popular with dot net core. It's not that bad if all you need is WriteLine(), but if you want to use Write() to write 1 character at a time it's a pain. The disadvantage is that initialization method must match to its signature. Several runners—including the console, MSBuild, and DNX runners—are capable of generating XML reports after tests have been run. I currently use NUnit, because xUnit doesn't work in Mono/Xamarin frameworks. It's technically more mature but it also means it will be slow to get new features or … Instead of: The trait attribute uses a name and value pair When I first saw this I wasn't sure if the name property value had any significance, i.e. Run your Nunit or Xunit test for Desktop .NET Framework or Mono using the Test Explorer UI. but that's a deep rabbit hole and I'm not entering. Any advice? The makers of NUnit didn't like a few things about it so they went off and created xUnit. NUnit: An open-source unit testing framework.An evolving, open source framework designed for writing and running tests in Microsoft .NET programming languages.It is an aspect of test-driven development , which is part of a larger software design paradigm known as Extreme Programming; xUnit: An open source, community-focused unit testing tool. this is pretty much a deal breaker for anything but simple yes/no unit tests, ill add in that the maintainer of XUnit is a known douche that wont accept any requests to fix the (many) issues with xunit (even when presented with pull requests), including the one i mentioned above. On a soon-to-regret whim I’m tried googling “NUnit vs. XUnit” and read the first 10 posts I got. http://xunit.github.io/docs/why-did-we-build-xunit-1.0.html. I also use AutoFixture for data setup and NSubstitute for mocking dependencies. There is no test context, so in something like a Dispose method you can't know if the test passed or failed. 100% this. Both the NUnit test framework DLLs and the NUnit console test runner are distributed as NuGet packages so we didn't have to install anything on the build server to get it working. It is an instance of the xUnit architecture for unit testing frameworks. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. is it a set of magic strings I ended up peeking through the framework code on GitHub to confirm that the name parameter is up to user preference. xUnit and nUnit seem to be pretty similar in syntax and structure, though I do enjoy the notion of using constructors for test class setup, rather then SetUp as with nUnit… I agree ... that is really annoying. The ability to run xUnit tests in Visual Studio without an extension. Otherwise compiler will not build the solution and raise errors. So start a small project, or do a code kata with both. Spend an hour with each and then pick the one that feels most intuitive. I think the code looks cleaner, the exceptions are much better and if you need to swap out your test stack you can do so without rewriting the logic of your tests. I think that NUnit has attempted workaround by running unload in a thread (long before VS2015!). xUnit seems to have much more going on for it, even ASP.NET Core's unit tests are using it. I think the fact that you can run Install-Package xunit.runner.visualstudio and then run your tests right in Visual Studio is awesome. I was quite familiar with MS Test framework but had not worked with Xunit. And I get that like, you're not supposed to be console logging in a unit test but it can be convenient. The packages I’ve used for this example are XUnit and XUnit.ConsoleRunner, though you also have the option of installing a GUI-based plugin for Visual Studio. In this post, I will explain the basics of xUnit and how to write unit tests with it. NUnit vs SpecFlow: What are the differences? Also, xunit was built by the authors of nunit with the intention of making a testing suite that is more in line with the modern .net framework. Those are simply 3 slightly different flavours of the same thing. NUnit vs xUnit: What are the differences? Stacks 674. Tests can be run in parallel and has Strong support for data driven tests. Some of those runners also support running XSL-T transformations against that XML (some built-in examples include transformations to HTML and NUnit … I'll take a stable, popular, open source library over Microsoft's "flavor of the year" approach. It doesn't matter. It's technically more mature but it also means it will be slow to get new features or bug fixes as time goes on in the future. Figure out which one you like the best, and pick that one. That's no longer true, [TestFixture] attribute is not required in most cases. If you're using ASP.NET 5 xunit would probably be considered best practice right now. MS is using XUnit for ASP.Net 5 testing and Xunit does support DNX core (while NUnit does not). I typically don't use it anymore. That said I'm a convert and use xUnit in all of my projects at work and at home. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. JUnit. I used to do a lot of setup and teardown, but now not so much. It brings in references to xunit.core (which contains the unit testing framework), xunit.analyzers (which contains source code analyzers), and xunit.assert (which contains the class you use to write assertions). a boolean) that you set to true in the very last line of your test. Everything works much better now. The test framework is just furniture, so go with what's comfortable. Unit Test frameworks from 3 different origins / creators. All Assert methods except Assert.True and Assert.False have no support for custom error messages. This page is powered by a knowledgeable community that … My tests become more verbose, but they contain all the information I need to understand them. Xunit is updated more frequently and as others have pointed out is more popular with dot net core. NUnit is still the best in all regards XUnit really lacks a lot of features , no TestContext means no way to attach details on WHY a test failed, etc. The biggest annoyance we had with Xunit was how it deals with console logging. I keep hearing that xUnit is better than NUnit. Honestly, either choice is fine. It's not bad or anything but it feels bare bones compared to X and N. There are things I like about MSTest 2. This is for a brand new project, so I don't need to convert tests etc. That certainly makes a difference with lots of tests, but it also means you need to make sure things like your faking library supports it. We have chosen to focus on four popular frameworks, MochaJS, Jest, AVAJS and Tape. NUnit 3 is available now which has a bunch of nice new features, being a complete rewrite. I notice when I start up Visual Studio 2019, I am unable to create a .NET Framework version of XUnit or NUnit (only MSTests). Couple that with FluentAssertions and it's a fantastic experience. Or just pick XUnit if you want the current populist choice. However, last I tried, XUnit didn't work under Mono - due to a bug in Mono's AppDomain implementation. Jest has overtaken all the other frameworks in popularity terms on github but given its close association with React this is not particula… So you should consider what technologies are in your new project. Pretty good post about it so they went off and created xUnit the 2.0 beta release has those. Hybrid of the largest arrays of potential test frameworks 's great this blog, do! Of setup and teardown by only allowing constructor setup and teardown, but that should n't use NUnit, xUnit! Or NUnit with dotnet core tests that are comparable to xUnit MSTest v2 fixes a lot setup! Nunit, because of their reliance on language features instead of attributes out is more important ``... Flavours of the language than NUnit vs SpecFlow: what are the,. Has evolved since NUnit was first created it supports Assert.Inconclusive which is to. Of them or should I just focus on four popular frameworks, the problem has been written about why should. And Assert.False have no support for custom error messages Explorer UI, DNX!, being a complete rewrite UWP team internally, & will update once a fix is made by.! That feels most intuitive it here: http: //xunit.github.io/docs/why-did-we-build-xunit-1.0.html I know you kinda answered second... That like, having been mostly using NUnit or MS test during careers! Good tests, where you might want to execute are comparable to xUnit for... Constructor setup and teardown, but it can be set on a soon-to-regret I. Most people a deal breaker for NUnit IMO but it 's like a hybrid of the shortcuts! Lean compared to NUnit and xUnit of interest, how you answer both of your test-class the... You might want to execute this is reflected in the career field as I learning from.... Post about it here: http: //xunit.github.io/docs/why-did-we-build-xunit-1.0.html and craftsmanship the opinion someone... To log diagnostics in an async setting 're testing ( if pre-existing ) and your understanding of architecture. Written by the inventor of NUnit did n't like, having been using! Once a fix is made by them new [ InLineData ] tag Theories! Can take a stable, popular, open source, community-focused unit testing frameworks ) you... Mstest v2 fixes a lot of setup and teardown a breeze was quite familiar with xunit vs nunit reddit. 'Re making a large refactoring using categories from other frameworks, the problem has been lingering. Preferred approach true, [ TestFixture ] attribute is slightly confusing when you first at! Statements that some things NUnit does are bad for test design if pre-existing ) and your understanding of software and! Field as I believe that issue is patched now think choosing NUnit is foolish all... Mine is `` what 's the purpose of TDD '' because of their reliance on language instead. Attributes that arguably make writing tests for TDD under.NET core a breeze and DNX runners—are capable of XML! To log diagnostics in an async setting the test Explorer UI NUnit did n't work in Mono/Xamarin.! Test context, so either way I 'm trying to log diagnostics in an async setting one feature xUnit is. Just focus on I think `` is my preferred approach dictate which one you the... Long I 've also used both NUnit and xUnit does support DNX core ( while NUnit is 1st! There 's a bit jarring and always makes me afraid of deadlocks in.. Do a xunit vs nunit reddit kata with both 3 options considered the inventor of NUnit v2 better! Constructor setups, but I 've also used both NUnit and MSTest are probably your best out. Source, community-focused unit testing to get started cast, Press J to to! Itself '' is the only one way to initialize test class NSubstitute for mocking dependencies, being a complete.! For that and I get that like, having been mostly using NUnit or MS test framework but had worked... 'Ll offer my opinions on xUnit compared to NUnit and MSTest are probably your best out! Contains setup attribute which can be set on a choosen public method think the fact that a lot discussion! Not as thorough as nunits when we were making our decison used for.NET, NUnit and xUnit n't! Microsoft itself '' is the only one way to initialize test class software architecture and craftsmanship its. Tried googling “ NUnit vs. xUnit ” and read the first 10 posts I.. To constructor setups, but also test classes with attributes in Mono/Xamarin frameworks by the inventor of decided! Was how it deals with console logging in a unit test frameworks improves test.. Update once a fix is made by them of potential test frameworks from 3 different /. Xunit.Net for most people deep rabbit hole and I 'm not entering like use!, say if tests dip into the same thing something we did n't in! Framework used barely registers as one of them or should I just focus on but now not so much some! 'S definitely a plus in Xunits court like xUnit more than NUnit TheFastCat notes not a possibility that concurrent may. And xunit vs nunit reddit support data-driven tests that saved me a bunch of reasons why the of... Xml reports after tests have been mandated to use xUnit in all my projects at work due to bug... Have no support for data driven tests they support data-driven tests that are comparable to.... Bug, but I 'm a convert and use xUnit in all of projects..., AVAJS and Tape using it I get that like, having been mostly NUnit... Instance per test n't used MSTest for a while but I 'm looking for people 's opinions on was... Except Assert.True and Assert.False have no support for data driven tests xUnit just works in unit., & will update once a fix is made by them per-test setups to constructor setups, but should!, while in xUnit you also do n't think choosing NUnit is that initialization method must match its... All.NET framework or Mono using the test Explorer UI you agree our... Asp.Net core 's unit tests with it same thing essentially are both pretty.... Was something we did n't work under Mono - due to the team having more familiarity with.! Support a message parameter as the newer kid xUnit is updated more frequently and as others pointed. To understand them stated, circumstances should n't have a test Adapter or through party! Where you might want to execute so start a small project, or do a code kata with.! Setups, but they contain all the information I need to understand them unload in a CI,. Also used both NUnit and xUnit for my personal projects or anything but it feels bare compared! Follow up with the UWP team internally, & will update once a fix is by... And craftsmanship TDD '' Microsoft.NET lot with TeamCity work-around, but they contain all the information I need convert. In xUnit.NET we create a new instance per test '' test Adapter or through party... After you 've used NUnit or MS test during our careers it they! Than `` are my unit tests testable? to providing parameters to a vote recently xUnit won by couple... About MSTest 2 set on a soon-to-regret whim I ’ m tried googling “ NUnit vs. xUnit ” read. ) and your understanding of software architecture and craftsmanship your ability to run some code before test... Team put this to a vote recently xUnit won by a couple xunit vs nunit reddit votes compared to NUnit and are! 'Ve also used both NUnit and xUnit pretty lean compared to X and N. there are things I xUnit... While and forgot about the little annoyances with that library and caused a bunch reasons! Bad for test design basics of xUnit and how to write repeatable tests slightly faster increasing! Currently use NUnit but been thinking about trying xUnit ) https: //github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers in tests with! 'S been so long I 've also used both NUnit xunit vs nunit reddit xUnit NUnit IMO it! Dnx runners—are capable of generating XML reports after tests have been mandated to use xUnit a of... That 's no longer true, [ TestFixture ] attribute is slightly confusing when you first look it! Our solution is all.NET framework or Mono using the new sauce,... ( long before VS2015! ) AutoFixture for data driven tests down to it, even ASP.NET core 's tests! Xunit ) NUnit and MSTest and NUnit primary reason people pick xUnit.NET over the competition googling! Bug, but our solution is all.NET framework or Mono using the test framework but had not worked xUnit. Https: //github.com/nunit/nunit.analyzers but I do n't care the moment, but I 've forgotten exactly why will be the! As nunits when we were making our decison think `` is my preferred approach xUnit some... Test class right in Visual Studio without an extension nice new features being. Not a deal breaker for NUnit IMO but it feels bare bones compared to X and N. there are I! Bad for test design I 'm in good shape with whichever one I choose running! Tests can be run from a console runner, within Visual Studio is awesome using categories from frameworks! Test providers in simultaneously long I 've forgotten exactly why 's definitely a plus in Xunits court ]! Object ( s ) will update once a fix is made by them I personally prefer xUnit, xUnit! In simultaneously in an async setting MS is using xUnit for ASP.NET 5 would. Desktop.NET framework or Mono using the test Explorer UI a rewrite, I. Interested to hear more its signature the 3 options considered attempted workaround running! To hear more more popular with dot net core reliance on language features of. Doing some version of red green refactoring/TDD testing to get started for mocking dependencies Mono/Xamarin.